Tracking AI-related disputes. Updated regularly.
Last updated: Loading...
How We Track Disputes
Why and how the AI Disputes Tracker works
Snapshot Overview
We track AI-related disputes—covering AI systems, alleged harms, and emerging legal issues—using U.S. court data sourced from CourtListener (Free Law Project) and other public records, with more jurisdictions coming soon.
What We Track
Disputes touching companies and institutions across the AI value chain
Disputes where AI tech is the central issue (e.g., generative, biometric, decision-making)
From IP/copyright breaches to bias, misinformation, and safety failures
Novel legal questions around liability, rights, regulation
Why?
- Spot patterns across jurisdictions
- Identify recurring risks and harms
- Anticipate litigation and regulatory trends
+ The Tracker is a living resource that updates as disputes evolve, giving lawyers and policymakers timely insight into the AI dispute landscape. U.S. case data is sourced from CourtListener (Free Law Project) and other public records. Deep Lex is independent and not affiliated with these providers.
If you have any questions or disputes to suggest, contact us: info@deep-lex.com
Disclaimer: Deep Lex aggregates public dispute data for research and informational purposes only. References to companies or disputes do not imply endorsement, affiliation, or opinion.
Loading cases...